Direction
Roadmap framing, product priorities, critical user paths, evidence standards, sequencing, and the decision about what not to build.
03 · Fractional CTO · Los Angeles
For founders and lean teams that have builders, vendors, or an active roadmap—but need one accountable operator connecting decisions across the whole system.
When it makes sense · 01
Fractional CTO support is most useful when the business has active builders and real product decisions, but no single operator owns their combined consequence.
What I own with you · 02
The exact decision rights are agreed before the engagement. The value comes from keeping context and accountability intact across the layers.
Roadmap framing, product priorities, critical user paths, evidence standards, sequencing, and the decision about what not to build.
Architecture, data and integration boundaries, infrastructure, delivery oversight, focused hands-on implementation, and technical handoff.
Reliability, security, recovery, observability, vendor evaluation, operating cost, and the evidence required before making claims.
Working cadence · 03
Priorities, authority, assumptions, and evidence stay explicit. Decisions are carried through the system instead of ending in a slide deck.
Establish the product state, team, roadmap, constraints, decision rights, and the operating evidence currently available.
Frame priorities, direct technical decisions, remove consequential blockers, and keep delivery connected to the business outcome.
Review what changed, what the evidence says, what remains exposed, and which decision the team should make next.
Relevant proof · 04
At Micr, I lead product direction, UX, architecture, and infrastructure across an active product with interconnected release, trust, recovery, reliability, and cost concerns. The case study makes the scope of that responsibility visible.
Read the Micr case studyNeed one accountable operator?
I’ll use a direct fit check to determine whether embedded leadership or a smaller engagement is the right next step.